Eyebrows should be brushed straight up...


33:03 whoa, her husband looks way hotter in this video than he did in the other one. I get it now.

Now it all makes sense.
Reply
Definitely one of the weirder channels I've ever come across, and that's saying something.

Main takeaway for me is though...

She was hitting on ALL the shit that is popular, WAY before it was popular, and now a considerable amount of time AFTER it's BEEN popular. So...

Why the fuck doesn't she have more subs? One of those "home movie" videos is enough to go viral and get a fuckton of views by itself.

But she's also got the short form content and a bunch of motivational/mindset stuff, which again, she was doing LONG BEFORE it was EVER popular. For real.

Did YT just penalize her from the jump cuz they thought it was spam? Shit, maybe so. Cuz if I had been subbed to her and she was posting several videos a day, likelihood is high that I'd unsub. But I've been subbed to her for a while now and it doesn't bother me when I see like 3 vids from her pop up in a row. It's not annoying or anything.

What is the deal with this? Seems like an example of someone being ahead of their time, and it seems like the matrix has a hard time catching up or aligning the timing right for people to actually see this shit, to become aware of it. And I don't think I've EVER had that thought before... the idea that someone is so revolutionary, the matrix itself kinda lags behind, or at the least it takes a long time to align more awareness around that entity.
Reply
33:50 he humors the shit out of her way too hard though, and she's like an attention hog. She didn't even know he was left handed. How the fuck do you not notice that about somebody, much less your husband??

There is not enough popcorn in the world to bingewatch this channel, so I am gonna humbly pass, but damn... humans are strange.

This shit is entertaining, you cannot deny it.

Reply
(02-15-2025, 11:00 PM)Mister Obvious Wrote: Why the fuck doesn't she have more subs? One of those "home movie" videos is enough to go viral and get a fuckton of views by itself.

Maybe so many home videos went viral that people just aren't that impressed by it anymore.

But old videos like that will ALWAYS be valuable because they're a time capsule and you can't MAKE MORE OF THEM.

In the same token, we have the opportunity to make videos today, so that means that sometime far in the future, they could be useful or valuable...

Less than these home movies are, just because it's so obscenely accessible to basically every person on the planet to film themselves now, lol.

But I feel like that's where the human element comes into play here... we're going into an individualistic society that also has a worldwide community aspect to it, so INDIVIDUALS and their stories will be valued, which means super old footage of their lives will be of interest to anyone who wants to know more about them. For whatever reason.

If everything doesn't get wiped out by EMPs and the internet really does last for a LONG time... it'll be an archive of so many people who have lived. With AI, you'd be able to make 'new' content with old, long dead people as the main star. Period. That's what is coming. I think it's morbid, potentially a huge moral violation, but it also sounds... inevitable. I'm not mad at it.
Reply
Historical figures are the ones you won't be able to recreate with AI... not unless there's some existing audio of their voice or something. Very rare.

Everybody else...

Anyone who has been recorded on video and then uploaded to the internet...

They can be 'recreated' with AI.

You add in MULTIPLE videos of them, multiple samples of their voice, years worth of posts on social media etc. to compile a personality file with...

And you can recreate anyone, make new content with their image based on things they'd "probably" say from their extensive archive of posts/videos...

Yup. That's the future. That's where this is going.
Reply
And that's only based on what is publicly sourced.

Google has been saving our search history, every article/page we've ever clicked on, reading through our Gmail accounts, since its inception.

Add that to everything that is publicly available, and you could recreate anyone, ACCURATELY.

There won't be any growth of their consciousness beyond what already exists and what's been archived, but it'd be like a fully animated snapshot of who they are, at least up until their archive cuts off.

I'm just saying.

I'm just fucking saying.

This is the truth.
Reply
This is the state of things.

This is the time we live in.

This is where we're at.
Reply
Wuuuuut.
Reply
mindblown
Reply
Sheeeeeiiiit.
Reply
Sunglasses 
Word.
Reply
(05-07-2024, 04:36 PM)Dark Dick Wrote:

Stumbled onto Seal's song from "Batman Forever" a few weeks ago.

(05-09-2024, 07:56 AM)Mister Obvious Wrote: Wow, I never knew the name of that song or who sang it. Feels like I haven't heard it in 100 years.



LilFacepalm
Reply


LOL. I forgot about Uma Thurman's "Poison Ivy".

I really liked how people looked in the 1990's.
Hands Up!  Panties Down!
Reply


Please note that new posts in this forum must be approved by a moderator before becoming visible.
[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)



















Disclaimer | Terms Of Service | Privacy Policy