06-12-2020, 10:04 PM
Well it's the authors of the bible who were the original flat earther's.
Lights in the sky are pretty. Not really interested in outer space tbh.
Innerspace is more interesting. Didn't you say the only way to get to another planet is
by imagining it, and it's impossible to physically travel to another planet?
That's some flat earth theory type stuff in itself. It's very creative but no one would take you
seriously. I've had my own theories about things like that, flights of imagination and can see
how it "may" be possible, but to claim it's the only way and also adhere to the notion that grounds
one to science because of optical lenses being able to observe celestial bodies it a bit contradictory.
Maybe it's not; I'm sure you can explain yourself on this issue. Clarity check. Maybe it's just practicing
cognitive dissonance.
Lights in the sky are pretty. Not really interested in outer space tbh.
Innerspace is more interesting. Didn't you say the only way to get to another planet is
by imagining it, and it's impossible to physically travel to another planet?
That's some flat earth theory type stuff in itself. It's very creative but no one would take you
seriously. I've had my own theories about things like that, flights of imagination and can see
how it "may" be possible, but to claim it's the only way and also adhere to the notion that grounds
one to science because of optical lenses being able to observe celestial bodies it a bit contradictory.
Maybe it's not; I'm sure you can explain yourself on this issue. Clarity check. Maybe it's just practicing
cognitive dissonance.
