04-23-2021, 02:09 PM
It's kind of surreal to see Jeremy Corbell's name all over this disclosure situation.
I've had some really positive interactions with him back when he was putting together footage for the Lazar documentary (this would have been around 2014).
But the nature of the deployment of disclosure is interesting.
1) Someone "leaks" the footage to Jeremy
2) Jeremy is given "permission" to share it on his own platform via George Knapp (Mystery Wire)
3) Once it's shared, the "Pentagon" admits that it's authentic naval footage, and that they don't know what it is
3.5) It now is a "story" that the Associated Press "takes interest" in.
4) Jeremy avails himself from one location to multiple outlets under the AP umbrella, exactly like a press junket, where an actor sits in a chair with the film poster behind them, and various media outlets sit next to the actor and fire off questions.
*This is a marketing campaign.*
What are we being sold?
I've had some really positive interactions with him back when he was putting together footage for the Lazar documentary (this would have been around 2014).
But the nature of the deployment of disclosure is interesting.
1) Someone "leaks" the footage to Jeremy
2) Jeremy is given "permission" to share it on his own platform via George Knapp (Mystery Wire)
3) Once it's shared, the "Pentagon" admits that it's authentic naval footage, and that they don't know what it is
3.5) It now is a "story" that the Associated Press "takes interest" in.
4) Jeremy avails himself from one location to multiple outlets under the AP umbrella, exactly like a press junket, where an actor sits in a chair with the film poster behind them, and various media outlets sit next to the actor and fire off questions.
*This is a marketing campaign.*
What are we being sold?
