HP Printers: Made to fail?
#1
Hmmm 
TBH, I've had this suspicion about printers in general for a LONG time.

But HP brand seems to be the biggest offender by far.

Maybe it's because it's the brand most people tend to buy since they're a little cheaper than a Brother printer for instance.

Most of the printers I've ever owned have been HP and they've all failed in some way within like a year (MAYBE 2 years) of use.

Not to mention that the new HP printers require access to the internet AND the HP software is absolute pure and total garbage.

The next printer I'm getting is gonna be a Brother.

It's just...

I am not prepared for a Brother printer to fuck up a year into use too.

I think it's a conspiracy, and I think it's fuckin' wrong.
Reply


Please note that new posts in this forum must be approved by a moderator before becoming visible.
[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Messages In This Thread
HP Printers: Made to fail? - by Mister Obvious - 04-16-2023, 03:34 PM
RE: HP Printers: Made to fail? - by user328 - 04-16-2023, 03:38 PM
RE: HP Printers: Made to fail? - by user328 - 04-16-2023, 03:39 PM
RE: HP Printers: Made to fail? - by user328 - 04-16-2023, 03:41 PM
RE: HP Printers: Made to fail? - by user328 - 04-16-2023, 03:55 PM
RE: HP Printers: Made to fail? - by user328 - 04-16-2023, 03:51 PM
RE: HP Printers: Made to fail? - by user328 - 04-16-2023, 03:57 PM



















Disclaimer | Terms Of Service | Privacy Policy