OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush: Elon Musk of the Sea, Titan Was His Starship

[Mister Obvious]

19:55 he was clearly just a really obsessed nerd when it came to this whole ocean exploration thingy. Which leads me to question... where WAS the funding for what he was doing?? Cuz it really does seem like he wanted to be the SpaceX of the ocean though. It really seems like he had big goals for "innovation" just like Elon does, so why didn't he a get a bunch of money behind it like Elon has?

Could it be because the only "alien" life that really exists within our local space neighborhood is HERE on the planet, and perhaps within the ocean's depths? Countless instances of people seeing UFOs rising out of all kinds of bodies of water, including oceans all over the world. So... is deep ocean exploration more of a threat to the official narrative of this planet's history (and humanity's origins) than traveling to space??

24:34 wow... he literally said what I said. This is much more intense than I figured it could be.

He basically said all the "alien" type of life is in the ocean and that building bases on other planets is stupid and a waste of money and Earth is the only place we should be conquering to ensure the future of humanity.

For me, this is the bottom line of the whole entire thing.

This is what Stockton Rush was trying to achieve.

He was essentially the anti-Elon, the "Team Earth" guy, the guy who understood that colonizing space is ultimately futile for reasons I've outlined in the past, and that the only real hope for humanity longterm is Earth based survival...

"The correct way to approach space travel is to do it right from the BEGINNING"
https://www.sectual.com/thread-17082.html

That means MANNED missions...

Solo missions.

The only bots or drones will be used with a human at the direct controls, or operating the secondary craft from a distance.

I am just telling you...

There are a lot of years of failure, and worst of all, INEFFICIENCY that you can be spared by just doing it CORRECTLY from the ONSET.

Manned space missions should be solo or at maximum have a very small crew.

"Interterrestrials: The 'aliens' are inner-earthlings"
https://www.sectual.com/thread-3743.html

All the space exploration crap is a red herring and attention diversion from what is UNDER the ground...

I've discussed the reasons why space exploration isn't feasible:

Interstellar travel is not possible because different stars emit entirely different particles. Beyond the magnetic field of a system's own star, there's nothing but dead space. The star system is like a bubble, and everything inside is powered by the particles of the sun. Different star systems' particles are incompatible.

Likewise, in every planet is a core that can essentially be thought of as a miniature sun. That's what it is. It's a tiny piece of sun. It has its own magnetic field, the earth's magnetosphere for example. The lifeforms which come to exist on each heavenly body do so with the elements present in the point at which they reside. For example, today's human is a surface creature, it's come to exist on the surface. The relationship with the surface and the sun, the relationship with the surface and all the surrounding elements. These relationships are precise in what they form. Humans can't exist up in the sky because the air gets too thin, they can't exist deep in the earth because it's too hot. They're lifeforms equipped for surface existence.

Therefore, they are not equipped to live in space. The farther away from their native position in the earth's magnetic field (and also the relation between that field and the sun's magnetic field), the harder it is for them to survive. There are so many threats to them in space. There's no surviving without machinery and special materials, and these materials and machines are ultimately fragile, doomed to fail because of the severity of conditions in space and on other planets.

Where humans cannot live naturally... they will not live. They will stagnate and decay, whether they "survive" for any period of time or not.