Anybody else thinking we should've had a moon base and put a man on Mars by now?

[Mister Obvious]

http://www.sectual.com/thread-472.html

Interstellar travel is not possible because different stars emit entirely different particles. Beyond the magnetic field of a system's own star, there's nothing but dead space. The star system is like a bubble, and everything inside is powered by the particles of the sun. Different star systems' particles are incompatible.

Likewise, in every planet is a core that can essentially be thought of as a miniature sun. That's what it is. It's a tiny piece of sun. It has its own magnetic field, the earth's magnetosphere for example. The lifeforms which come to exist on each heavenly body do so with the elements present in the point at which they reside. For example, today's human is a surface creature, it's come to exist on the surface. The relationship with the surface and the sun, the relationship with the surface and all the surrounding elements. These relationships are precise in what they form. Humans can't exist up in the sky because the air gets too thin, they can't exist deep in the earth because it's too hot. They're lifeforms equipped for surface existence.

Therefore, they are not equipped to live in space. The farther away from their native position in the earth's magnetic field (and also the relation between that field and the sun's magnetic field), the harder it is for them to survive. There are so many threats to them in space. There's no surviving without machinery and special materials, and these materials and machines are ultimately fragile, doomed to fail because of the severity of conditions in space and on other planets.

Where humans cannot live naturally... they will not live. They will stagnate and decay, whether they "survive" for any period of time or not.

People with no family to speak of, no kids etc are great candidates for off world colonization. It's a pointless death mission though. Humans need to fix the problems on earth instead of just running away. Wanting to colonize space when we don't even know what's at the depths of our own oceans is the perfect example of that human greed which always leads to disaster.

Here's an interesting article describing what it feels like to be in space: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...feel-awful

The description of feeling like you're falling backward when you put your head forward because of inner ear fluid...

It just gives such a good example of how out of synch and totally misplaced humanity is in space.

If you think about this view of the solar system...




It's so easy to see how an out of place element, like humans in space, is out of synch with the entire process. That kind of imbalance won't be tolerated. The only reason manned missions have been successful is because they're small scale. A couple humans, whatever. It's skirting the edge, it's not enough to cause a serious adjustment. The more they do it though, the more necessary an adjustment will become. Adjustments are fast too, I would guess space debris/meteors would be the tools. Kind of in line with my theory about asteroids being almost 'magnetically' drawn to impact the earth when things get too far out of balance on the planet.

Just sayin'...