Paris Jackson
#1
Quote:Paris-Michael Katherine Jackson (born April 3, 1998) is an American model, actress, singer, and musician. She is the second child and only daughter of Michael Jackson and Debbie Rowe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Jackson
Reply
#2


I think it's a bad idea for her to attempt to sing this kind of music...

It's a cute sort of early 2000s throwback style, but I don't think it fits her voice.

Singing this kinda stuff over time will cause too much vocal strain.

People in the comments were saying her previous music was a better fit for her voice...



There's no contest between the vocal style in this song, and the one from her most recent performance.

Lighthouse has a great album cover though, let's be honest about that...

https://i.imgur.com/GnilLcK.png

Done in the style of the Smith-Waite tarot, it's hard to lose with that one.

None of it is the kind of music I give a fuck about, but I think it's clear which one is better.



Her voice is obviously very pretty, despite the shite streaming quality of this stream.

You have the typical people in the comment sections saying she seems "lost" and all that typical kinda rhetoric you hear from people trying to judge the lives of strangers.

I'd say she probably is just about as "lost" as any young person tends to be. The only difference is inherent fame, access to money, connections, etc.

I'm just saying... "folky" is her style and to stray from that is unwise. She's probably tried out this new rockier genre because she felt unsatisfied with the reception of her previous music...

The solution isn't to change your genre, the answer is to just keep making more music until she's recognized for what fits her best. It's not like she doesn't have the resources to do that, so there's no excuse.
Reply
#3
(06-23-2022, 03:26 PM)Chatwoman Wrote: Singing this kinda stuff over time will cause too much vocal strain.

You can tell from that livestream she already has a certain level of vocal fry going on.

Singing in rockstar style will only make it worse.

She'll be left unable to sing well in a softer voice and unable to sing rock style too.

It's a lose/lose to pursue the rock aspect of things.

Her "rockstar" stage presence makes me feel like Lisa Marie Presley is her fricken mother.

I'm not saying that's bad, but Lisa Marie didn't have a whole shit ton of success in her career either.

Don't try to be like anybody else, that's what I'd say.

She can balance out her dad's body of work by doing music in a completely opposite style of anything he ever did.

Rock isn't the opposite of Michael Jackson, but folk definitely is.
Reply
#4
(06-23-2022, 03:29 PM)Chatwoman Wrote: Her "rockstar" stage presence makes me feel like Lisa Marie Presley is her fricken mother.

She looks like Debbie Rowe though, so there's not a doubt she's her mother... but I'm just saying, there are definite Lisa Marie vibes there.

Previous discussion about Michael Jackson's kids...

https://www.sectual.com/thread-16318-pos...#pid106569

(01-27-2020, 05:36 PM)Chatwoman Wrote: I guess this is why some celebs never reproduce.

So their kids can't be victims to all this shit.

A lot of them adopt or whatever.

Michael Jackson comes to mind...

None of his kids are biologically his, I guarantee it...

Maybe he thought that would save them. Maybe it mostly worked, except for in the case of Paris, who's had some issues with "them".

https://i.imgur.com/RVMDZtY.jpg

Prince Michael "Blanket" Jackson does look like he could have some relation to Michael, but mostly he just looks Native American, so it's hard to say.

Could be possible Michael did hide his real DNA in one of the offspring, but I don't think he is biologically related to most of them, if any.

If not, you know it had to be on purpose.

Michael planned his kids with extreme calculation, for reasons which I'm sure did have a lot to do with whatever terms he agreed to in his crossroads moment...

He probably tried his damnedest to find loopholes and work around the terms... in a lot of ways, both legally, spiritually, and otherwise.

And I'm sure with the major amount of funds he had to put toward designing the kids, he probably chose them to be made up of elements which interested him personally for whatever reason. I doubt he was really all that concerned with any of them truly having much of his DNA.

It could be possible his kids have multiple fathers, or at least two... Michael and another man.

I'm sure he had access to designer babies on a level that the rest of the world never will (nor should they).

https://www.sectual.com/thread-16032-pos...#pid151789

(04-07-2022, 10:59 PM)Chatwoman Wrote: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mi...na-1870561

I think Mark Lester is probably father to at least one of Michael's children... he seems to believe all three are his. It's possible Blanket could be his if a different mother was used. Debbie Rowe may be Prince and Paris's mother but she's probably not Blanket's mother.

It could be that Michael's own DNA wasn't used for any of his kids, and the 'castrato' rumors could be true. I wouldn't put it past Michael's asshole father to get him castrated as a kid just to keep making money off his voice.
Reply
#5
Yoda 
Fuck she hot MO im going to take a shower this thread makes me think about rude things.
Reply
#6
She has an exotic look.
Reply


Please note that new posts in this forum must be approved by a moderator before becoming visible.
[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)



















Disclaimer | Terms Of Service | Privacy Policy